§Ò¹ÇÔ¨ÑÂ : ¡ÒÃ»¯ÔÃÙ»¡ÃÐºÇ¹¡ÒÃàÃÕÂ¹ÃÙéÇÔªÒ¤³ÔµÈÒÊµÃìã¹âÃ§àÃÕÂ¹
â´Âà¹é¹¡ÃÐºÇ¹¡ÒÃ·Ò§¤³ÔµÈÒÊµÃì
Reforming of the Learning Processes in School Mathematics
with Emphasizing on Mathematical Processes

â´Â : ÃÍ§ÈÒÊµÃÒ¨ÒÃÂì ´Ã.äÁµÃÕ ÍÔ¹·Ãì»ÃÐÊÔ·¸Ôì


º·¤Ñ´ÂèÍ
ÀÒÉÒÍÑ§¡ÄÉ
Reforming of the Learning Processes in School Mathematics
with Emphasizing on Mathematical Processes
Dr. Maitree Inprasitha and others
Abstract
The purpose of this research was threefold: 1) to investigate learning processes in school mathematics of elementary and junior highschool students using openended problems, 2) to construct a model for developing students’ learning processes by implementing openended problems and metacognitive strategy, and 3) to disseminate the developed model to mathematics teachers in the Khon Kaen provincial areas.
This research used a qualitative methodology with 12 pairs of 46 grade students and another 12 pairs of 13 grade junior high school students. In the first phase, each pair of students solved each of three openended problems in a single day outside their classrooms. During the problemsolving session, research assistants conducted field notes related to students’ important problemsolving behaviors. The research assistants then held interviews with each student in each pair respectively after problemsolving session. Audio  and video  tape recording was conducted through all sessions mentioned earlier.
The primary data to be used for protocol analysis was transcriptions of each pair of problem solving session. This data was used complementarily with data from field notes and from interview sessions, and other teaching and learning styles of participating schools. The research results from this phase have been used to construct a teaching model called “Metacognitive Instruction Model”. This model shows various factors influencing students’ problemsolving and communication in problematic situations in classrooms. In the outer loop of the model, social and cultural factors are considered in context to be constraint to mathematical problemsolving activities. In the middle loop of the model, teaching, students’ learning strategy, facilitation, and teachers’ teaching strategy influence each other factor in a circulating manner and set a more closely related context for mathematical problemsolving activities. Particularly, in the middle loop, students’ and teachers’ strategies have their own subloop comprising of beliefs and previous experiences interacting with other factors in the just mentioned loop. In the inner loop, negotiation, students’ activity, sharing, and teachers’ activity are four factors interacting with each other and create the most apparent context for problemsolving and communication in the problematic situations in mathematical problemsolving activity in the classroom.
The metacognitive instruction model has two roles in this research: a hypothetical framework for characterizing teachers’ and students’ roles, and for analysis of students’ learning processes in the classroom in the following phases: 1) The model has been used in the teaching experiment in the classroom. 2) The overall research results and the model have been disseminated to 200 mathematics teachers in the elementary and secondary schools in Khon Kaen province through workshop seminars.
The research results have revealed that: 1) using openended problems and protocol analysis methods for analyzing students’ mathematical learning processes, particularly in mathematical processes, made it possible for researchers to indicate what kind of problemsolving behaviors illustrating metacognitive mathematical problem–solving behaviors. In other words, researchers can investigate whether each pair of students could become aware of their thinking process during mathematical problemsolving activity. In addition, the research results suggests that all openended problems used in this research create an appropriate situation for enhancing metacognitive mathematical problemsolving behavior. However, students’ metacognitive problemsolving behaviors vary from problem to problem. The most apparent openended problems for students to demonstrate their metacognitive behaviors are worm’s movement problem, telephone line, and magnetic problems in the elementary and secondary schools respectively. On the other hand, students both in elementary and secondary school demonstrated less Metacognitive behaviors in the geometrical problem; 2) In constructing metacogntive instruction model, the following factors have been taken into consideration: social and cultural factors, teachers’ and students’ beliefs and previous experiences in mathematics classrooms; 3) The research team has successfully disseminated the research results and the developed model to approximately 200 mathematics teachers from elementary and secondary schools in Khon Kaen province. From the questionnaire survey, the participant teachers suggest that openended approach is a promising teaching innovation consistent with the notion of reforming the learning process in current movement. They also suggest further inservice training programs in the following issues: learning process and technique in using openended approach in the classroom, and how to construct openended problems in other content areas.


